Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLangfeldt, Liv
dc.contributor.authorNedeva, Maria
dc.contributor.authorSörlin, Sverker
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Duncan A.
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-30T12:37:06Z
dc.date.available2019-08-30T12:37:06Z
dc.date.created2019-08-27T11:11:24Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-26
dc.identifier.citationLangfeldt, L., Nedeva, M., Sörlin, S. & Thomas, D. A. (2019). Co‑existing notions of research quality: A framework to study context‑specifc understandings of good research. Minerva, 1-23.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0026-4695
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2611879
dc.description.abstractNotions of research quality are contextual in many respects: they vary between fields of research, between review contexts and between policy contexts. Yet, the role of these co-existing notions in research, and in research policy, is poorly understood. In this paper we offer a novel framework to study and understand research quality across three key dimensions. First, we distinguish between quality notions that originate in research fields (Field-type) and in research policy spaces (Space-type). Second, drawing on existing studies, we identify three attributes (often) considered important for ‘good research’: its originality/novelty, plausibility/reliability, and value or usefulness. Third, we identify five different sites where notions of research quality emerge, are contested and institutionalised: researchers themselves, knowledge communities, research organisations, funding agencies and national policy arenas. We argue that the framework helps us understand processes and mechanisms through which ‘good research’ is recognised as well as tensions arising from the co-existence of (potentially) conflicting quality notions.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherSpringernb_NO
dc.relation.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11024-019-09385-2
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectResearch quality notionsnb_NO
dc.subjectResearch policynb_NO
dc.subjectResearch fieldsnb_NO
dc.subjectResearch organisationsnb_NO
dc.subjectKnowledge communitiesnb_NO
dc.titleCo‑existing notions of research quality: A framework to study context‑specific understandings of good researchnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber23nb_NO
dc.source.journalMinervanb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11024-019-09385-2
dc.identifier.cristin1719028
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 256223nb_NO
cristin.unitcode7463,0,0,0
cristin.unitnameNIFU Nordisk institutt for studier av innovasjon, forskning og utdanning
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal