Co‑existing notions of research quality: A framework to study context‑specific understandings of good research
Journal article, Peer reviewed
MetadataShow full item record
Original versionLangfeldt, L., Nedeva, M., Sörlin, S. & Thomas, D. A. (2019). Co‑existing notions of research quality: A framework to study context‑specifc understandings of good research. Minerva, 1-23. 10.1007/s11024-019-09385-2
Notions of research quality are contextual in many respects: they vary between fields of research, between review contexts and between policy contexts. Yet, the role of these co-existing notions in research, and in research policy, is poorly understood. In this paper we offer a novel framework to study and understand research quality across three key dimensions. First, we distinguish between quality notions that originate in research fields (Field-type) and in research policy spaces (Space-type). Second, drawing on existing studies, we identify three attributes (often) considered important for ‘good research’: its originality/novelty, plausibility/reliability, and value or usefulness. Third, we identify five different sites where notions of research quality emerge, are contested and institutionalised: researchers themselves, knowledge communities, research organisations, funding agencies and national policy arenas. We argue that the framework helps us understand processes and mechanisms through which ‘good research’ is recognised as well as tensions arising from the co-existence of (potentially) conflicting quality notions.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Evaluation of research in the humanities in Norway: Publication and research personnel. Statistics and analyses Aksnes, Dag W.; Gunnes, Hebe (NIFU-rapport;2016:14, Research report, 2016-06)This report provides statistics and indicators of the scholarly peer-reviewed publication output and research personnel within humanities. The report was commissioned by the Research Council of Norway and the main purpose ...
Gulbrandsen, Magnus (NIFU Report;2016:36, Research report, 2016-10)The humanities are widely discussed in the science policy debate in Norway. Several books have been published on the field’s nature and uniqueness, and its framework conditions are discussed in leading newspapers and ...
Aksnes, Dag W. (NIFU Report;2017:6, Research report, 2017-05)Som ledd i en pågående evaluering av norsk polarforskning, har NIFU gjennomført en publiserings- og siteringsanalyse av denne forskningen. Analysen omfatter norsk polarforskning generelt og norsk og utenlandsk forskning ...