Changing research on research evaluation: A critical literature review to revisit the agenda
Peer reviewed, Journal article
MetadataShow full item record
Original versionThomas, D. A., Nedeva, M., Tirado, M. M. & Jacob, M. (2020). Changing research on research evaluation: A critical literature review to revisit the agenda. Research Evaluation, 29(3), 275-288. 10.1093/reseval/rvaa008
The current range and volume of research evaluation-related literature is extensive and incorporates scholarly and policy/practice-related perspectives. This reflects academic and practical interest over many decades and trails the changing funding and reputational modalities for universities, namely increased selectivity applied to institutional research funding streams and the perceived importance of university rankings and other reputational devices. To make sense of this highly diverse body of literature, we undertake a critical review of over 350 works constituting, in our view, the ‘state-of-the-art’ on institutional performance-based research evaluation arrangements (PREAs). We focus on PREAs because they are becoming the predominant means world-wide to allocate research funds and accrue reputation for universities. We highlight the themes addressed in the literature and offer critical commentary on the balance of scholarly and policy/practice-related orientations. We then reflect on five limitations to the state-of-the-art and propose a new agenda, and a change of perspective, to progress this area of research in future studies.
PublisherOxford University Press
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Evaluation of research in the humanities in Norway: Publication and research personnel. Statistics and analyses Aksnes, Dag W.; Gunnes, Hebe (NIFU-rapport;2016:14, Research report, 2016-06)This report provides statistics and indicators of the scholarly peer-reviewed publication output and research personnel within humanities. The report was commissioned by the Research Council of Norway and the main purpose ...
Impacts of the SFF scheme on the Norwegian research system : Sub-report I to the SFF evaluation panel Borlaug, Siri Brorstad; Langfeldt, Liv; Gulbrandsen, Magnus; Ramberg, Inge (NIFU-rapport;2019:28, Research report, 2019-12)This report was commissioned by the Research Council of Norway (RCN) to serve as background information for an international scientific committee appointed to evaluate the SFF scheme. The report should be seen in conjunction ...
Understanding and evaluating research and scholarly publishing in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) Sivertsen, Gunnar (Journal article; Peer reviewed, 2019-06-28)Internationalization is important for research quality and for specialization on new themes in the social sciences and humanities (SSH). Interaction with society, however, is just as important in these areas of research ...