Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSeeber, Marco
dc.contributor.authorAlon, Ilan
dc.contributor.authorPina, David G.
dc.contributor.authorPiro, Fredrik Niclas
dc.contributor.authorSeeber, Michele
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-04T12:19:21Z
dc.date.available2022-11-04T12:19:21Z
dc.date.created2022-09-22T10:37:51Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationTechnological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022, 184 1-16.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0040-1625
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3030173
dc.description.abstractResearch often fails to be translated into applications because of lack of financial support. The Proof of Concept (PoC) funding scheme from the European Research Council (ERC) supports the early stages of the valorization process of the research conducted by its grantees. This article explores the factors that predict who will apply for ERC grants and which grant proposals will prove successful. By combining information from two datasets of 10,074 ERC grants (representing 8361 individual grantees) and 2186 PoC proposals, and using automated machine learning, we can identify the main predictors of the propensity to apply and to win. Doing so fills a void in the literature on likelihood to apply. The results reveal major differences between potential and actual beneficiaries, due to decisions about applying for a grant and evaluations of the proposals. The decision to apply is affected by the interaction between the characteristics of the PoC funding scheme, the ERC grantee, and his/her environment. Grantees in countries that invest little in innovation, with low cost of personnel, and strong collaboration in innovation are more likely to apply. Male grantees are more likely to apply but have similar chances of winning as women.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.titlePredictors of applying for and winning an ERC Proof-of-Concept grant: An automated machine learning modelen_US
dc.title.alternativePredictors of applying for and winning an ERC Proof-of-Concept grant: An automated machine learning modelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-16en_US
dc.source.volume184en_US
dc.source.journalTechnological Forecasting and Social Changeen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122009
dc.identifier.cristin2054220
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel