Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKlitkou, Antje
dc.contributor.authorFevolden, Arne Martin
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Allan Dahl
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-05T07:15:34Z
dc.date.available2022-09-05T07:15:34Z
dc.date.created2022-05-13T14:51:02Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationEnergies. 2022, 15 (3), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1996-1073
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3015640
dc.description.abstractIn the acceleration phase transitions often increase in depth and scope, and thereby create knock-on effects for wider system structures. In the renewable energy transition, for example, higher shares of intermittent renewable energy sources call for new grid technologies to increase flexible grid operation. At the same time, there are different ways of achieving renewable energy transitions and providing flexibility. In Europe, important tensions exist over how centralised or decentralised a renewable energy electricity system should be. This paper explores to what extent and how European framework programmes for research and development have addressed and supported innovation in transmission grid (centralised system) and distribution grid (decentralised) technologies. We analyse European R&D projects that studied electricity grid planning, development and innovation over 2002–2020. We apply social network analysis of the collaboration partners in these projects, and analyse the calls for proposals issued by three European Framework Programmes: FP6, FP7 and Horizon 2020. The framework programmes have addressed energy-related issues, but the priorities have changed over time, reflecting the ongoing energy transition. We ask if the importance of transmission grid vs. distribution grid has changed over time, and if and how the collaboration patterns have changed.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.titleEU R&D Funding for Electricity Grid Technologies and the Energy Transition: Centralised versus Decentralised Transition Pathwaysen_US
dc.title.alternativeEU R&D Funding for Electricity Grid Technologies and the Energy Transition: Centralised versus Decentralised Transition Pathwaysen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber0en_US
dc.source.volume15en_US
dc.source.journalEnergiesen_US
dc.source.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/en15030868
dc.identifier.cristin2024433
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel