Understanding and evaluating research and scholarly publishing in the social sciences and humanities (SSH)
Journal article, Peer reviewed
MetadataShow full item record
Original versionSivertsen, G. (2019). Understanding and evaluating research and scholarly publishing in the social sciences and humanities (SSH). Data and Information Management, 3(2), 61-71. 10.2478/dim-2019-0008
Internationalization is important for research quality and for specialization on new themes in the social sciences and humanities (SSH). Interaction with society, however, is just as important in these areas of research for realizing the ultimate aims of knowledge creation. This article demonstrates how the heterogenous publishing patterns of the SSH may reflect and fulfill both purposes. The limited coverage of the SSH in Scopus and Web of Science is discussed along with ideas about how to achieve a more complete representation of all the languages and publication types that are actually used in the SSH. A dynamic and empirical concept of balanced multilingualism is introduced to support combined strategies for internationalization and societal interaction. The argument is that all the communication purposes in all different areas of research, and all the languages and publication types needed to fulfill these purposes, should be considered in a holistic manner without exclusions or priorities whenever research in the SSH is evaluated.