Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorStensaker, Bjørn
dc.contributor.authorHovdhaugen, Elisabeth
dc.contributor.authorMaassen, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-15T10:37:57Z
dc.date.available2019-05-15T10:37:57Z
dc.date.created2019-04-23T14:25:43Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationStensaker, B., Hovdhaugen, E. & Maassen, P. (2019). The practices of quality management in Norwegian higher education: Collaboration and control in study programme design and delivery. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(4), 698-708.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0951-354X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2597669
dc.description.abstractPurpose: In recent decades, higher education institutions have been encouraged to develop their own internal management systems as a response to perceived quality challenges in the sector. These quality management (QM) systems have often been found to mainly reflect external accountability requirements, with less focus on coherent study programme development. The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between QM practices and study programme delivery in Norwegian higher education institutions. Design/methodology/approach: The study examined how coordination and control of quality work with respect to educational activities take place, using data from a survey to study programme leaders in a large sample of Norwegian higher education institutions. Findings: The main findings show that a majority of institutions have established formal advisory bodies with a QM mandate, contributing to more coherent thinking, even though the division of labour between these bodies and formal decision-making structures often is unclear. The study also shows a high level of diversity in the collaboration practices among different actors involved in QM work, indicating that QM practices are adapted to local needs. Originality/value: The paper provides new knowledge as to how QM is conducted in practice at the local level. It nuances earlier studies by showing the involvement of collegial bodies in QM although such bodies may have unclear mandates and, thus, an unclear role in the QM process.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherEmeraldnb_NO
dc.subjectLeadershipnb_NO
dc.subjectQuality management practicesnb_NO
dc.subjectHigher education qualitynb_NO
dc.titleThe practices of quality management in Norwegian higher education: Collaboration and control in study programme design and deliverynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber698-708nb_NO
dc.source.volume33nb_NO
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Educational Managementnb_NO
dc.source.issue4nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/IJEM-11-2017-0327
dc.identifier.cristin1693492
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 237960nb_NO
cristin.unitcode7463,0,0,0
cristin.unitnameNIFU Nordisk institutt for studier av innovasjon, forskning og utdanning
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel