Evaluating and improving research-society relations: The role of normal and extraordinary impact

dc.contributor.author	Sivertsen, Gunnar
dc.contributor.author	Meijer, Ingeborg
dc.date.accessioned	2019-02-16T14:31:37Z
dc.date.available	2019-02-16T14:31:37Z
dc.date.issued	2018
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2585790
dc.description.abstract	Reflecting on current methods in evaluations of the societal impacts of research, this policy brief pinpoints the distinction between normal and extraordinary impact of research and the limitations of evidence-based case studies. Societal impact does not occur primarily as unexpected extraordinary incidents of particularly useful breakthroughs in science. Is it more often a result of normal everyday interactions between organizations that need to create, exchange and make use of new knowledge to further their goals.	nb_NO
dc.language.iso	eng	nb_NO
dc.publisher	NIFU	nb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseries	R-QUEST Policy Brief;3
dc.rights	Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no	*
dc.title	Evaluating and improving research-society relations: The role of normal and extraordinary impact	nb_NO
dc.type	Others	nb_NO

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal