Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSivertsen, Gunnar
dc.contributor.authorMeijer, Ingeborg
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-16T14:31:37Z
dc.date.available2019-02-16T14:31:37Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2585790
dc.description.abstractReflecting on current methods in evaluations of the societal impacts of research, this policy brief pinpoints the distinction between normal and extraordinary impact of research and the limitations of evidence-based case studies. Societal impact does not occur primarily as unexpected extraordinary incidents of particularly useful breakthroughs in science. Is it more often a result of normal everyday interactions between organizations that need to create, exchange and make use of new knowledge to further their goals.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherNIFUnb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesR-QUEST Policy Brief;3
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleEvaluating and improving research-society relations: The role of normal and extraordinary impactnb_NO
dc.typeOthersnb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal