dc.contributor.author | Sivertsen, Gunnar | |
dc.contributor.author | Meijer, Ingeborg | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-02-16T14:31:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-02-16T14:31:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2585790 | |
dc.description.abstract | Reflecting on current methods in evaluations of the societal impacts of research, this policy brief pinpoints the distinction between normal and extraordinary impact of research and the limitations of evidence-based case studies. Societal impact does not occur primarily as unexpected extraordinary incidents of particularly useful breakthroughs in science. Is it more often a result of normal everyday interactions between organizations that need to create, exchange and make use of new knowledge to further their goals. | nb_NO |
dc.language.iso | eng | nb_NO |
dc.publisher | NIFU | nb_NO |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | R-QUEST Policy Brief;3 | |
dc.rights | Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.title | Evaluating and improving research-society relations: The role of normal and extraordinary impact | nb_NO |
dc.type | Others | nb_NO |