Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSivertsen, Gunnar
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-25T12:54:44Z
dc.date.available2017-09-25T12:54:44Z
dc.date.created2017-08-16T11:10:05Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn2055-1045
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2456576
dc.description.abstractInspired by The Metric Tide report (2015) on the role of metrics in research assessment and management, and Lord Nicholas Stern’s report Building on Success and Learning from Experience (2016), which deals with criticisms of REF2014 and gives advice for a redesign of REF2021, this article discusses the possible implications for other countries. It also contributes to the discussion of the future of the REF by taking an international perspective. The article offers a framework for understanding differences in the motivations and designs of performance-based research funding systems (PRFS) across countries. It also shows that a basis for mutual learning among countries is more needed than a formulation of best practice, thereby both contributing to and correcting the international outlook in The Metric Tide report and its supplementary Literature Review.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.relation.urihttps://www.nature.com/articles/palcomms201778
dc.titleUnique, but still best practice? The Research Excellence Framework (REF) from an international perspectivenb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.volume3nb_NO
dc.source.journalPalgrave Communicationsnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1057/palcomms.2017.78
dc.identifier.cristin1486569
cristin.unitcode7463,0,0,0
cristin.unitnameNIFU Nordisk institutt for studier av innovasjon, forskning og utdanning
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel