Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAamodt, Per Olaf
dc.contributor.authorFrølich, Nicoline
dc.contributor.authorStensaker, Bjørn
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-30T06:15:58Z
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-01T07:42:57Z
dc.date.available2016-06-30T06:15:58Z
dc.date.available2016-07-01T07:42:57Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn0307-5079
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2395130
dc.description.abstractWhile the establishment of quality assurance has been seen for decades as the most significant instrument to secure and enhance the quality of teaching and learning in higher education, the concept of developing more specific learning outcomes has in recent years attracted much interest, not least due to the creation of national qualification frameworks. In this article, we compare the perceived relevance of the traditional quality assurance approach with the new learning outcomes approach – as seen from the view of the academic staff. Using data from a representative survey among Norwegian academic staff, the study indicates that learning outcomes are perceived as more useful and relevant than traditional quality assurance approaches. The article discusses this finding in light of the current ways quality assurance procedures are functioning in higher education, and points to possible implications for the enhancement of quality in universities and colleges.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.subjecthigher education policynb_NO
dc.subjectorganization structuresnb_NO
dc.subjectresearch policynb_NO
dc.subjectgovernancenb_NO
dc.titleLearning outcomes – a useful tool in quality assurance? Views from academic staffnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.date.updated2016-06-30T06:15:58Z
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03075079.2016.1185776
dc.identifier.cristin1365136


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel